But it's really nothing compared to Xuyun's Weiyang lineage what is a clear case of remote succession (yaosi 遙嗣) as we can see here.
However, it all becomes ironic when we read from Ven. Shengyan,
What is important to highlight here is that among all the expressions of Chinese Buddhism, Chan is the only tradition with an uninterrupted lineage, and a formal institutional foundation.Let's just say that these fun facts were an appetiser for Jiang Wu's "Enlightenment in Dispute: the reinvention of Chan Buddhism in seventeenth-century China". It is worth reading, at least the conclusions at the end of each chapter and part 4.
And one more informative work I found today is Dr. Jimmy Yu's "A Tentative Exploration into the Development of Master Sheng Yen’s Chan Teachings" (PDF)
The phrase "the only tradition with..." always sounds suspicious, I guess. :)
ReplyDeleteJimmy Yu, in one of his posts on H-Buddhism, says, "Either way, Dharma transmission was
ReplyDeleteso confusing in late imperial times (but probably has always been this
way in Chan history) that in many cases, the transmission meant nothing
more than assuming abbotship at a temple."